There are countless ways to interpret the line "all you need is love". There is, of course, the literal way, in that you don't need food or drink or oxygen, but I'm going to guess that most people can think more deeply about it than that.
From my experience, many people consider it a message stating that everyone should love everyone, and that in itself will create a perfect world.
Confucious, however, counters both those statements with his belief that a "counterforce" is needed.
As much as I like The Beatles, I'm going to have to go with Confucious on this one. I think his point that we need li to balance out jen is valid, especially in our society. Being happy and loved is obviously important, but think about why we are happier at one point as opposed to another. I'm happy when I get a good grade not only because the grade is good, but also because it is not bad. A contrast of things that are loving and/or "good" is necessary to make us happy. If all we did was love, then the significance of that love would diminish. That is why I must disagree with The Beatles and say that perhaps simply respecting someone is often more beneficial than always loving them. It makes the love all the more important.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that a counterforce to love is needed, however i dont think its a simple as something being good, and not bad at the same time. Using good grades as an example, I feel that it makes me feel good because its good, but also due to pride, satisfaction, and a number of other emotions. Also do you think even if the significance of love decrease a society based on love could not still have order and peace?
ReplyDeleteHallie, I’m glad to see you taking a clear position, but remember the one main content rule regarding blog posts: explore the possible answers first, then take a position. Show me you’re actively considering the options.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how happiness crept into the conversation. The question was would being loving toward others create a stable, peaceful society. You seem to suggest this can't happen unless there's love's opposite as well. I'm really confused by this. Does there need to be hate in the world for me to hold the door for someone? For me to feed someone who is hungry? Doesn't seem like it. Please clarify.
You offer the idea of respect as a governing principle which might work, but you don't show how it's any better.